|
Paul E. Lee has experience in handling Premises Liability cases. If you or
someone you know has been affected in the state of by Premises Liability,
we can help.
The term “premises liability” refers to the liability of certain persons for injuries and damages to others arising from the ownership or possession of real property. In California, premises liability is based on general principles of negligence and is controlled both by statute and case law.
As in any other negligence action, the injured person must establish the following:
1) The existence of a duty on the part of the defendant to use due care;
2) A breach of this legal duty; and
3) The breach as the proximate or legal cause of the resulting injury.
Premises liability actions have traditionally involved “slip and fall” or “trip and fall” causes of action. Premises liability is not, however, limited to such causes of action and includes, among other things, construction accidents, dog bite cases, lead poisoning, defective and/or inoperative lighting, failure to warn of hazardous conditions, and injuries caused by the negligent or willful conduct of third persons on the premises involved.
In determining who is liable in a premises liability action, the crucial elements are ownership, possession, and control of the premises. The person who owns, possesses, or controls the premises is the one responsible for any injuries arising from a condition of the premises.
The landowner’s duty differs based on the status of the occupier and the visitor. There are three different legal types of visitors and the degree of responsibility owed by the owner varies according to the status of the injured person.
The three types of visitors are:
- 1) Invitees or business visitors An invitee is a business visitor who is invited or permitted to enter or remain on the land of another for the purpose directly or indirectly connected with business dealings between such person and the owner or possessor of the land.
- 2) Licensee A licensee is a person who comes onto the land of another by consent or permission, but for his or her own purpose having no relation to the business of the owner or occupant.
- 3) Trespassers A trespasser is a person who enters or remains on the land of another without a privilege or consent to do so.
The term “invitee” is misleading. A social guest may be invited, but is still considered to be a licensee. The distinguishing characteristic of an invitee is a mutual business interest with the occupant of the premises, while a licensee is on the premises for his or her own purpose.
AA-Accident Attorneys, PLC legal professionals are experienced in handling premise liability cases inside the state of California, with offices located in Southern in Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Santa Barbara, Kern, San Luis Obispo, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego counties...and in Northern in Alameda, Marin, Placer, Sacramento, San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties, as well as Nevada and Las Vegas.
If your case involves the Federal courts, AA-Accident Attorneys, PLC has handled many personal injury cases that involved Federal court rulings for defective products and dangerous drugs. Call us today at 800.260.2577.

*Disclaimer: This does not constitute a guarantee, warranty or prediction regarding the outcome of your case and results include that of independent associated counsel from NV, CA and AZ. Pictures depicted are a dramatization only and may not be members of the firm or actual accident scenes. In the event of a loss, you may be obligated to pay the opposing parties fees and costs. We are not affiliated with any public agency. Nothing on this site, including the URL title, is to constitute an inference or implication that we are the "best" (or similar word) attorneys in comparison to other firms, but rather states our opinion. In the event that you fill out any forms or request a case evaluation, this does not guarantee that you: (a) do in fact have a case (b) that we will become your legal representation (c) does not guarantee a response from one of our attorneys (d) enter into any type of relationship with the firm. It is at our discretion to call you or take you on as a client. AA Accident Attorneys makes no claim or representation regarding, and accepts no responsibility for, the quality, content, nature or reliability of third-party web sites accessible by hyperlink from the site, or web sites linking to the site. This website, postings, articles, upkeep, and general online presence is controlled by a marketing team and is not necessarily the views, opinions, or writings of any Attorney(s) at AA Accident Attorneys

|
| |
 |
| |
 |
| Recent Testimonials |
 |
AA Accident Attorneys

Reviewed by John C. -
2012
.
Great Personal Injury Lawyer!
Your office and staff have done a great job regarding our case. To be honest, we would not have been able to get through it without all the help you have given us...we have recommended your Staff to several people
Rating:
5.0
|
 |
AA Accident Attorneys
 
Reviewed by Jane D. -
2012
.
Top Car Accident Lawyer!
I called AA Accident Attorneys and they got right on my case. They were professional, hardworking and caring for my injuries. I was very pleased with the outcome. I would recommend them to anyone who is looking for a serious injury attorney
Rating:
5.0
|
 |
AA Accident Attorneys
 
Reviewed by Sara D. -
2011
.
California Injury Lawyer who wins!
I called Paul E. Lee, he was assuring and sympathetic. He negotiated with the insurance company and got me $575,000.00. Thank you soo much Paul, I cannot tell you how grateful I am to you.
Rating:
5.0
|
 |
AA Accident Attorneys
 
Reviewed by Past Client -
2011
.
Accident Attorney That Cares
The insurance company originally denied my claim that's when I called Paul. Paul got me $100,000. It was quick and easy and I did not have to go to court.
Rating:
5.0
AA Accident Attorneys
 
Average rating: 5.0
Top Car Accident Lawyer for all of California. Call for free Evaluation!
based on
18 ratings.
18 user reviews.
Read More Client Reviews
|
| |
 |
| Past Settlements |
 |
$15,000,000
To a minor from a power company truck hitting him, resulting in brain injury.* |
 |
$1,600,000
Slip in fall accident resulting in serious injury due to negligence of major company. |
 |
$2,000,000
For a wrongful death of a mentally disabled man due to health care center neglect, where he choked to death.* |
 |
$4,950,000
From negligent big rig trucking company causing wrongful death.* |
-
 |
$4,000,000
From negligent security leading to severe burns.* |
 |
$2,000,000
From negligent security company for not protecting public.* |
 |
$1,800,000
From Trucking Company due to negligent hiring resulting in accident.* |
| |
|
|